Welcome to Impact Interactions’ B2B Social Media Catalyst Series
In our new B2B Social Media Catalyst Series, we are going to provide our best practices for developing or enhancing your B2B social media efforts. Too often, we see content on the web that promotes the idea that B2B and B2C social media tactics should be used in the same manner. Based upon our experience with major B2B brands like Cisco, SAP, NetApp, and midsize B2B companies like Micropole, we respectfully disagree with that idea.
The main reason is focused upon the results that marketers are trying to achieve when using social media. Consumer focused efforts usually are attempting to build awareness which leads to trial of the product or service. That’s why couponing and discounts work so well in the space. Think of Dell’s results on Twitter. They gained results by constantly announcing a discount on their products which lead to a sale. Yes, some small businesses bought using this channel, but the majority of customers were individuals seeking out a discount.
Business to Business focused firms have a much different path to success using social media. Their efforts are based upon building awareness to build a relationship that is mutually valuable and sustainable. In most cases, B2B social media efforts are not built for quick transactional results, but rather for a longer term relationship. In our experience, this is why we believe that B2B social media is a complimentary tactic to your relationship selling strategy.
So let’s get started with a quick introduction to the series by learning a bit more about the differences we’ve noticed during our work with our business to business clients and colleagues.
We’d like our B2B Social Media Catalyst Series to be an online roundtable for discussion of these issues. Please feel free to add your comments to this blog entry and the team at Impact Interactions will be happy to discuss our experience and ideas with you. You can download the presentation and transcript in our Social Media Resources library.
Future series sessions will include the building blocks for a successful B2B social media strategy, beginning with content then moving to the 3rd Party application (think Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook) beacon strategy we recommend to our clients, social media monitoring tactics, building stronger conversion and engagement rates, measuring your B2B social media efforts, and a framework for using social media for your lead generation and customer nurturing efforts.
We hope that you’ll join us for the series over the next several weeks and let us know if there are specific topics that you’d like to see us cover in our B2B Social Media Catalyst Series.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Monday, January 17th, 2011 at 12:01 pm and is filed under Best Practices. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Moving Beyond Counts & Traffic – Social Media Measurement That Works
Lots of interesting research coming out on Social Media recently. We take note because the results and conclusions continue to demonstrate that measurement remains a high priority for executives, but what is delivered is not meeting their needs. Let’s take a look at some recent examples of companies surveyed about their social media efforts from a measurement point of view.
First a study from White Horse of 104 companies using social media shows us that when companies try to measure the success of their social media efforts, that very few (less than 15%) are able to get to an ROI for their work. They continue to use traffic and participation (we put that in our behavior metrics) to demonstrate success.
Here is another study which demonstrates a similar point, that companies are using social media traffic and behavior metrics as a measurement of success. This study completed by King Fish Media in June 2010 has great information; unfortunately, it reveals that while many companies say that they have a social media strategy in place they don’t understand how to measure its results.
Perhaps it is the way the research is presented versus the actual question asked, but when you read the measurements used for value they are not representing economic value in most cases. Rather, marketers and others measuring social media continue to focus on representing traffic as some sort of proxy for value. Worse, many still believe that the number of followers on Twitter or fans on Facebook is a valuable metric to use to demonstrate value. They couldn’t be more wrong…
Even the famed Guy Kawasaki is promoting an idea that the more followers the better during a TweetChat on MarketingProfs…but his perspective is the larger the audience from a sheer numbers perspective the better your results will be. In our experience, that is just not true. We see that the more QUALIFIED followers you have, the better your results MIGHT be.Why? Because the value of a follower is zero until they do something that brings value to the organization. If all they are doing is following and never taking action, can you assign a value to them? We think not. Have you analyzed your followers? How many are customers? How many are prospects? How many are competitors? (How many have followed your account to simply build their own counts through an auto-follow?)
So where does all this lead? Well, if you are attending theiStrategy meeting in Chicago on September 15-16, we’ll be there to address this issue. I’ll be presenting this topic on the morning of the 16th to the attendees.
I’ll demonstrate a stronger methodology for using a more integrated approach to your social media efforts which allows you to focus only on the metrics that really matter… those that lead to economic value for your organization.
For those of you who cannot attend, the presentation will be added to our social media resource center after the meeting ends. For those of you who are attending, please bring your questions!
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 31st, 2010 at 10:34 am and is filed under Measurement & Reporting, Social Media Industry. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Online Community – Moving Beyond Metrics to ROI
We gave a presentation on building ROI models for online communities at the Online Community Unconference in Mountain View, CA on June 10th. It was added because so many of the participants stated that ROI and calculating the value of their community was the most important issue they faced. So, we didn’t have time to build a true presentation, but rather lead a workshop for participants to learn more. It was lead by our president, Mike Rowland.
Here are the summary notes taken during the session:
- Have to first identify what is the economic value of the community to the organization offering it: (Don’t confuse traffic or behavior metrics with value)
- Cost Avoidance
- Increased subscription rates or lower churn rate
- More frequent purchase rates
- Higher purchase level/amts
- Faster close for large item sales
- Reduce lead generation cost
- Once you’ve identified your value metrics, break down your metrics into 3 buckets to look at communities:
- Traffic – PV, visits, visitors, etc.
- Behavior – What they do when the get there, who they are, download/visit, contribution/member, responses by employees vs. customers
- Value – can attach an economic value to it. Need $ to get to a true ROI model. See above list.
- You have to build relationships w/ the folks in your company. Need access to other systems. You cannot build ROI from community analytics provided by software vendors or from traffic and behavior metrics alone.
- ROI Frameworks:
- Cost Avoidance
- The person who proposes the question needs to verify the answer. This is a feature needed in the platform.
- # of community support resolutions X $ complimentary support resolution (1-800 number) = total cost avoidance -> economic value
- Track over set period of time (e.g. quarterly or yearly)
- ROI = (total economic value – total costs to set up and run forum) / total costs –> over one period and as a percentage
- Increased subscription or reduced churn
- Customer database compared to community database
- cust. database = Average churn rate (e.g. the number of months the avg user subscribes) X price/subscription = customer value
- Community database – look at active members and see if the churn rate is better or worse.
- Price will be the same, so you’ll have to see if the churn rate was more or less. If subscriptions are longer, than you have a higher customer value for community members.
- Shows you slowed the churn rate down.
- More frequent purchase or Higher Purchase level/amts
- Use your eCommerce DB or CRM system
- What is the avg amt customers spend/purchase?
- go back to comm DB and parce out active members and compare to ecommerce DB (which ones spend more/purchase?)
- Do comm members have a higher spend/purchase? active comm users X avg $ they spend = economic value
- Need to trend this and see how it fluctuates.
- what is the average number of items in completed shopping activity? (e.g. 1.6 items) Do comm members buy more?
- Avg cost/item X avg # items = economic value
- CRM decrease cost
- Want to find what avg value of customer is
- Faster close of sale (Good for large purchases like software or hardware systems)
- How fast are organizations moving through your CRM system to sale?
- Identify active organizations in community DB to compare them to avg organizations.
- How long does it take the avg. organization to go through sale stages? What’s the cost/sale? Do active organizations in your community go through more quickly and spend more?
- Lead generation cost
- Similar to above, but use cost to generate a lead for average customer versus those which originate in community/social media campaigns
- Cost Avoidance
- How can you tell if a user came to your comm and then bought your product through a 3rd party reseller? You can’t unless your resellers provide access to their databases which is next to impossible to get.
- Users of support communities become brand neutral after their issue becomes resolved.
- Hidden costs of community for ROI Analysis, make sure you count these:
- Servers
- development costs
- customizations
- widgets
- maintenance
- Make sure that you are amortizing your costs across the same time period as your economic value or you will skew your results.
One point to remember is that the value of communities really is derived from active members, not all members. So define your active members with criteria that meet your behavioral key performance indicators (KPIs). For example, an active member can be someone who posted in a forum, downloaded a featured whitepaper, uploaded content, or viewed a webcast in the past month. For B2B especially, it doesn’t have to be an activity within the past week as most B2B community members average 2-3 visits per month unless they are deep into the sales cycle.
The number one issue to watch out for when building your ROI framework is the use of proxies. If you cannot get the data, don’t guess at a proxy for the value because the more proxies you utilize the bigger the house of cards that you build.
Lastly, value can be a set of different items. For a subscription based community value can be both churn rate differential and purchase levels. ROI is not a single value formula, it is a multiple value formula in most cases as there is marketing value in support communities and vice versa. So make sure that you are at least attempting to capture as much of the value drivers as possible in your analysis.
Want to learn more about online community or social media ROI? Contact us today or leave a comment.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Monday, June 22nd, 2009 at 11:47 am and is filed under Best Practices, Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
B2B Communities – What Works
We gave a presentation at last week’s Online Community Unconference (site is open to the public as of June 19th per Forum One) in Mountain View, CA on B2B Communities. We weren’t surprised by the number of attendees looking to learn more about the best practices for running a B2B Community, but were surprised a little bit by some of the misperceptions on managing them.
Top Best Practices for B2B Communities:
- B2B Community Members have higher expectations than B2C members. You must engage with them as they want to engage with your company just as much as they want to engage with their peers.
- B2B Communities require internal SMEs to engage early and remain committed to meeting member needs until external SMEs can compliment the internal SME efforts.
- Third party applications like Twitter and Facebook should not be used as external competitive communities, but rather should be utilized as beacons to drive traffic to your community and key information.
- You can measure the ROI for B2B communities, but you cannot get there by using only community software metrics and/or web analytics packages like Omniture or Google Analytics. None of these provide true value metrics that have an economic value associated with them. To get to ROI, you must build relationships within your organization so you can obtain real data on customers, leads, ecommerce transactions, etc.
- When budgeting for B2B communities, be realistic. For example, no single vendor of software or web design or implementation services will ever come in exactly where they quote when you want additional features or customization. So build a small cushion into your budget to be safe.
- To attract business decision makers, you must focus on how they will use the site… not how you want to market to them.
- The higher the level within an organization your potential members have attained, the lower the amount of time they will have to spend on your site. So don’t waste their time!
In short, B2B communities can deliver impressive results when managed properly with a focus on those segments who deliver the value to your organization. Don’t be all things to all people, that strategy is doomed to fail. To learn more about the best practices for B2B communities, please download our presentation , ask questions in the comments area below, or contact us.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 17th, 2009 at 12:49 pm and is filed under Best Practices, Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Online Brand Defense: What Campaigns Can Learn from the Obama Attack
By now, we’ve all seen and heard about the false rumor released about Barack Obama attending a madrassa in Indonesia published online by the conservative Insight magazine. The amazing thing is that the article was published online and was allowed to run rampant all over the blogosphere for several days before the rumor was finally killed off. In our work with online communities that discuss politics, this rumor spread like wildfire with many, many conservative posters slamming Senator Obama and his campaign. Online Community sites like Hannity.com, Slate.com, and even AARP.org had many members publicizing the rumor for several days.
Once the mainstream media picked up the story, it had additional power online.
Yet, there was no one online to debunk the rumor for Senator Obama’s campaign.
As we see it (and we admit we’re biased), organizations must be prepared to deal with the inevitable attacks that take place online. In the case of presidential campaigns, they need a team that is established in the main online communities of the web as well as familiar with the bloggers out there who want to dethrone a candidate if they can. There must be a plan to deal with the negative publicity that is a part of online life today. It is no different than what we advise companies to do.
The question is whether the Communications Directors for these campaigns understand this as well as the Brand Managers who understand why brand defense is so important online today.
Want to learn more about how Impact Interactions helps organizations defend themselves online? Contact us today.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Thursday, January 25th, 2007 at 4:36 pm and is filed under Best Practices, Social Media Trends. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

