You can’t be a thought leader on Twitter. Discuss without getting verklempt.

Remember that hilarious skit called “Coffee Talk with Linda Richman” on SNL? You know, the one with Mike Meyers dressed up like a lady with a giant Brooklyn accent and even bigger hair? I loved that skit and one of my favorite parts was how he would give people a ridiculous topic to talk about and then say “Discuss!” So what does this have to do with social media? Well, recently a report by the Center for Marketing Research at the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth found that corporate blogging among Inc. 500 companies has decreased while Twitter and Facebook use has increased. Now, it’s great that companies are embracing these new social media outlets but are they missing out by focusing on micro-blogging as opposed to actual blogging? My vote is “yes” because it’s the business equivalent of companies throwing out ideas and saying “Discuss!” ala our friend Ms. Richman.

Frank Reed, managing editor of Marketing Pilgrim, wrote an article in response to the report that I happen to agree wholeheartedly with. Frank’s opinion is basically that companies who are just doing Twitter and Facebook while ignoring the power of corporate blogging are taking the easy road out. As someone who blogs in my personal time, I can attest to the fact that blogging takes time, lots and lots of time. It’s not like Twitter. You can’t be Linda Richman and throw out a topic and hope people have a valuable conversation about you just because you gave them something to retweet. You have to think about what topic you want to write about, do your research, and then sit down and write it. Then, of course, you have to edit it, proof it, edit it some more, change the title three times, and then post it. That may seem overwhelming to most companies both in the effort needed to compose a blog and the money spent while that person is blogging. Twitter and Facebook are cheap and cost effective making them very popular in a tough economy. In ten seconds you can tweet a quip out to all of your followers and then tell all your corporate buddies you’re a social media mogul. However, what happens when they try to find out more about you? If all you have to show for your communication efforts are one sentence Facebook status updates and a hundred tweets about how you’re a leader in your industry they’re going to sniff out the shallow facade from a thousand yards away.

Yes, blogging is time consuming. Yes, it might open you up to people disagreeing with you. But, in the end, is that a bad thing? Is it bad to defend your stance? Is it bad to show you are so much more than a status update or a tweet? The idea of being cheap and cost effective works great when you’re trying to justify the business cost of mass producing, say, toys for a kid’s meal. But you can’t apply that same thinking to representing your brand’s leadership. Do you really want your leadership to seem cheap and cost effective? Gaining the trust of clients isn’t about efficiency. In the end, they don’t care just about the fact that you know 5 different programs and have X number of other clients. That information might be a hook to get them interested but it’s not going to keep them around. They want to know that you really and truly know what you’re doing. Can you prove that in 144 characters? Probably not.

This post was dedicated to Barbara.

Back to the blog

Pro-Active Social Media: Taking Audience Engagement to the Next Level

While doing some research on how companies are incorporating social media into their communications, I came across two intriguing articles that really got me thinking about how far the social media industry could go and whether it should go there. The first article, When Customer Service is a Twitter Response, was actually written in response to the Hotels Magazine article, A Day in the Life of the Digitized Hotel(registration required to read). The Hotels Magazine article was a proposed day of interaction between a hotel and their guest completely driven by social media. First, the guest gets off the plane and complains on Twitter that the taxi line is long to which to hotel quickly responds asking if they would like the hotel to contact a car service for them. In a second exchange, the guest is sent a message on their hotel provided iPad recommending a massage because the guest had mentioned in a tweet that they were considering having one after a long day. Finally, when the guest returns home and mentions the hotel in their tweet the hotel again responds this time thanking the guest and giving them a code for a complimentary upgrade on their next stay.

The idea of taking social media to this level was fascinating even though the “big brother” aspect was admittedly a little creepy. The comments I read in the Economist article were mostly against this kind of heavy social media driven interaction. Many of the comments lamented the loss of human interaction in our society while others were somewhat unsettled by the thought of companies knowing that much about where they were and what they were doing. One commenter actually recounted how he stayed at a hotel only to find out that the hotel (and many others) had actually removed the in-room phones because they assumed that all their guests had cell phones and it was just costing them money to keep them in the rooms.

Taking it to the extreme that the fictional hotel did does smack of something from Minority Report but I’m still left asking myself why shouldn’t companies engage their audience (or event heir business partners) in this way just on a smaller scale? I don’t know that I lament the use of social media by companies to pro-actively engage their customers. If my options for communication are calling a company and being put on hold for an undetermined amount of time or making a request online which can instantly be dealt with, I know which one I’m picking.

I recently helped put together a presentation on examples of companies successfully implementing social media into their business plan. One of the stand outs was TATA Docomo, a telecom provider in India. Rather than operating like most corporations who expect the masses to come to them, TATA Docomo realized that the only way they were going to make inroads in the tough Indian telecom market was to go to the people. They now skillfully leverage both Twitter and Facebook as their main means of communicating with their customers for both customer service issues as well as informing them of new offerings. This has lead to huge customer loyalty despite the lack of a “physical” connection.

The generations that are coming of age now are doing it in a time of amazing digital advancements. I’m old enough to remember the days before the internet was a daily part of life but young enough to be in the generation of adults who are keen to absorb any new digital gadget that comes onto the market. Businesses need to realize this fact and capitalize on it. Don’t be afraid of using social media for these kinds of communications. Companies that start a Facebook page only to tell all the people who ask for help that they need to contact the customer service number are going to be sorely disappointed by their “community” building efforts. That’s because they aren’t engaging people in the places where they actually want to be engaged. The example of TATA Docomo is one that companies should look to as the way forward. TATA has engaged their communities consistently on the formats they know are the most popular. What did it get them? It took them from the bottom of the Indian telecom barrel to the top of the mountain. They were the 9th telecom company to enter the Indian market and faced competitors who had been there for years but in a very short time they were the top. Why? It worked because they embraced what social media could do for them.

Ignoring the changing communication landscape is the equivalent of sticking your head in the sand. The world is changing around us, why not change with it? Our two part blog series on this very topic titled Executive Use of Social Media discusses the importance of this changing landscape and highlights the success several major companies have had in implementing social media into their business operations. Part One is already posted so be sure to check back and watch Part Two.

Back to the blog

Executive Use of Social Media – A Collection of Research (Part 1)

 

There’s been a shift in social media. Have you seen it? Business to business companies in industries beyond the traditional early adopters are utilizing social media more effectively today to build awareness, generate business, and nurture customers than as little as six months ago. Research that has been published over the past year shows that B2B social media is not only becoming more prevalent, but is also expected by customers, prospects, investors, and recruits.

In the video below, we’re going to interprete the relevant research from multiple sources in order to present a pretty compelling analysis for using social media in the business to business setting. In Part 2 of this topic, we’ll show you how several companies such as Cisco, Intuit, ShipServe, and Impact Interactions have used social media in the B2B setting to achieve real business results. We’ll also provide you with a measurement methodology which will help your team to quickly identify areas where action is necessary as well as where you are successful.

So in the words of the immortal Warner Wolf, let’s go to the video tape!

Back to the blog

Why Social Media Shouldn’t Be Treated Like a Shiny New Toy

We’ve all seen it happen. A kid begs their parents for the latest and greatest toy because ALL of their friends have it. The toy gets bought, played with in earnest for a week or two, and then is promptly set aside only to collect dust and create clutter. Then one day the child’s parent walks into the room to find something and is totally overwhelmed by the mountain of junk they have to sift through to find what they need. The same can happen to your company’s social media campaign if you aren’t careful.

Too often, companies launch Facebook and Twitter sites before fully understanding why they want them. They don’t know what it does or how to use it but they know their competitors have it and they assume they need it to give them an edge. So, they get their Facebook page going, send out a few Tweets, and make ready for the waves of new fans and maybe even some customers. Except, the fans and customers don’t come. Why? Because the company didn’t think about what they were going to do with their new toy once they got it and now it’s just another waste of money.

Social media has power; a lot of it. But you have to wield that power in the right way. We at Impact Interactions strongly believe in what we call the “Beacon Strategy.” You want to utilize certain tools in ways that will guide new users to your main repository of information (your website), not leave them lost in the sea of digital clutter. Facebook and Twitter can’t replace a robust website full of quality information, nor should it. These are simply tools, lures even, that should be used judiciously. When considering how to use these tools you must first know where you’re going, what you want to achieve, and how you can measure your success. Once you have determined those things then you can go out and make the investment in developing a social media campaign. Always understand the why of your campaign before you think about the how and then make a commitment to nurture the campaign over time rather than letting it sit and get dusty next to the last latest greatest business toy you just had to have.

Back to the blog

Why Blogs Work in B2B – Featured B2B Magazine Article

I was recently interviewed by Jon Vanzile for an article he wrote for B2B Magazine (6/6/11) titled “Is Blogging Over?” along with our client, Jeanette Gibson of Cisco. The article is in response to a New York Times article in February claiming that blogs are losing their marketing power, especially with younger audiences due to the growth in Twitter and Facebook. When we spoke about this, I told Jon that this isn’t the case from our experience in the B2B world. In fact, blogs are a cornerstone for B2B marketers (or should be) who are looking to develop stronger relationships with their customers, prospects, and stakeholders. Here is my quote from the article about why blogs work for B2B marketers:

“When you look at the B2B market, what’s necessary is thought leadership, and you cannot get thought leadership in 140 characters or a Facebook post.”

Think about this for a moment.

We counsel our clients that the main difference between B2B social media and B2C social media is the needs of the audience and the buying cycle timing. For B2C, social media is about building awareness and then trial. B2B is much more complex, it is about building awareness then relationships with the audience. Why? Because in general, the sales cycle for B2B is longer than B2C so more effort and information is necessary to help your prospect move to become a customer.

Blogs can play a big role in this relationship building process by highlighting your company’s thought leadership in the industry. Companies want to buy from companies that will be leading the industry and can demonstrate staying power. By providing executive views of the world to your audience, you help them to understand that your company is a leader and will be there in the long term to help your customers.

Can Twitter or Facebook do the same? No, they cannot. Here is a better way to use these tools in your B2B marketing.

We work with our clients to use B2B social media tools like Twitter, Facebook (yes, it does work in B2B), LinkedIn Groups, and YouTube in their online marketing mix. But we recommend a stronger process of using these tools as a complimentary set of tactical processes that support business objectives. We do that through our “Beacon Strategy.”

Just as a lighthouse helps ships to find safe harbors, the correct use of social media tools can help your audience find the best information you can provide quickly and efficiently on their time. Social media in a B2B setting works best when it works together with blogs and compelling content to educate and help audiences to learn more about your products, services, view of the industry, and support issues. By pointing your social media content on third party sites such as Twitter or LinkedIn Groups back to your controlled website, you have the advantage of measurement while your audience has the advantage of learning more. B2B social media requires measurement. Friends, followers, group members, etc. don’t mean anything until they are engaged in a conversation or contact process with your firm. Why? Because you cannot measure anything of real economic value until the person completes an action. Those actions should take place in your harbor, not somewhere in the vast ocean that is the internet.

Getting back to the article, B2B blogs when clearly written with compelling content are one of the best destinations in your safe harbor for people to learn about your company. In a project we did with SAP back in 2004 and 2005, we saw that one of the best indicators of whether a company was moving towards purchase was their reading of the SAP Executive Blog Series. This was a series of blogs by SAP Board Members and top executives at the time (people like Hasso Plattner, Shai Aggasi, Leo Apotheker, etc.). Why? Simple. Before a company spends thousands of dollars on your products, their executive team wants to know if you are aligned with their interests and if your company is truly customer focused. Blogs help to show this to your audience.

So, are blogs dead? For B2B marketers looking to use relationship marketing, the answer is a resounding NO!

Back to the blog

Welcome to Impact Interactions’ B2B Social Media Catalyst Series

In our new B2B Social Media Catalyst Series, we are going to provide our best practices for developing or enhancing your B2B social media efforts. Too often, we see content on the web that promotes the idea that B2B and B2C social media tactics should be used in the same manner. Based upon our experience with major B2B brands like Cisco, SAP, NetApp, and midsize B2B companies like Micropole, we respectfully disagree with that idea.

The main reason is focused upon the results that marketers are trying to achieve when using social media. Consumer focused efforts usually are attempting to build awareness which leads to trial of the product or service. That’s why couponing and discounts work so well in the space. Think of Dell’s results on Twitter. They gained results by constantly announcing a discount on their products which lead to a sale. Yes, some small businesses bought using this channel, but the majority of customers were individuals seeking out a discount.

Business to Business focused firms have a much different path to success using social media. Their efforts are based upon building awareness to build a relationship that is mutually valuable and sustainable. In most cases, B2B social media efforts are not built for quick transactional results, but rather for a longer term relationship. In our experience, this is why we believe that B2B social media is a complimentary tactic to your relationship selling strategy.

So let’s get started with a quick introduction to the series by learning a bit more about the differences we’ve noticed during our work with our business to business clients and colleagues.

We’d like our B2B Social Media Catalyst Series to be an online roundtable for discussion of these issues. Please feel free to add your comments to this blog entry and the team at Impact Interactions will be happy to discuss our experience and ideas with you. You can download the presentation and transcript in our Social Media Resources library.

Future series sessions will include the building blocks for a successful B2B social media strategy, beginning with content then moving to the 3rd Party application (think Twitter, Linkedin, Facebook) beacon strategy we recommend to our clients, social media monitoring tactics, building stronger conversion and engagement rates, measuring your B2B social media efforts, and a framework for using social media for your lead generation and customer nurturing efforts.

We hope that you’ll join us for the series over the next several weeks and let us know if there are specific topics that you’d like to see us cover in our B2B Social Media Catalyst Series.

Back to the blog

The Social Media Strategist Report – How Self Important Are We?

Echo Chamber Cartoon Sourced from GapingVoid.com

I just finished reading the latest report from Altimeter Group’s Jeremiah Owyang titled “Career Path of the Corporate Social Media Strategist” and frankly was a bit disappointed.  Mind you not with the survey, it’s rigor, and its results, but rather with the predictive assumptions about the importance of the Social Media Strategist in the organization and with the continued pushing of change management topics within in the context of using social media.

First off, in an early stage of the Social Media Strategist’s career it’s highly unlikely that he or she “answers the call of duty” then “challenges the status quo” only to “lose altitude” but quickly recoup to “overcome cultural challenges” only to find “the increase in program requests from internal stakeholders – unmanageable.”  Really? Taking this viewpoint into consideration with the other points made about lacking any ROI, having problems with measurement, etc., can you really believe that these folks were able to overcome the cultural challenges of their organizations? Or were some of the members interviewed simply part of organizations that are innovative,  customer focused, and willing to try something longer than a single business cycle?

Our team has met several of the people interviewed. In fact, we work with several of them at Cisco and SAP. They don’t use this type of hyperbole in describing where they came from, how they started or expanded social media for their companies. These folks by and large are solid business people, who (as the report correctly states) saw an opportunity and made the most of it.

The second issue that I have with this report’s projections about the two career paths of the Social Media Strategist. Essentially, they are given as Help Desk Operator or Rock Star. We’d say the reality is somewhere in between with the Rock Star status being limited to very, very few people.

Let’s look at the Help Desk Operator according to the report. This person will be swamped by requests, if they cannot do everything the other departments want to then the other departments will run over them to launch their own facebook pages. In reality, most organizations are building out more structured approaches to using social media. While the helter-skelter methodology may have taken off as tools were adopted, most companies are more structured than given credit for in the report and are actively providing guidelines for the use of social media by various groups. An excellent example of this is SAP, where Brian Ellefritz and team are helping multiple organizations within SAP learn the best practices and how to stay on point with SAP’s messaging/branding. Another example is Cisco’s use of governance groups/councils to help guide departments in successfully using social media. This is not the future, it is now. Groups of stakeholders within companies work through a social media team to ensure a more strategic and valuable use of social media. It won’t be a help desk, it will be a best practice sharing knowledge group coupled with IT for the tools and analytics teams for the measurement.

The report also falls into the trap of using the number of followers on Twitter as some sort of metric for the importance of the Social Media Specialist. But is it really? We’d say it isn’t. Read our Gaming the Twitter System: Why Follower Counts Don’t Represent Influence to learn why.

So, if you’ve read this far you probably believe that I’m negative on this report. I’m not. It is the first real attempt to use research methods to draw conclusions about the Social Media Strategist position. We just wish that the hype about this industry would diminish somewhat… we’ve seen this same hype in the early days of online communities, then blogs, then social networks, and now with social media. It extended to the people who would run the community, blog, social network, and now social media. The reality is that social media is a set of great tools which some folks use adeptly and successfully while others don’t. And the rock stars? Well, they’re mostly the well hyped conference speakers you see everywhere. Let’s just see where they are in five years shall we?

Back to the blog

Impact Interactions to Exhibit at SocialTech 2010 (October 26)

Are you attending the upcoming Marketing Profs SocialTech 2010 event in San Jose on October 26th? If so, we hope that you’ll come say hello and bring us your social media questions. Our team will be exhibiting at the event and will be available to answer questions that you may have regarding social media for technology companies.

The Impact Interactions team has a long history of helping B2B Technology companies. In 2000, our president Mike Rowland helped Cisco Systems launch and manage its first online community, The Networking Professionals Community (NetPro). Mr. Rowland also helped SAP launch its first online community, the SAP Business Community as well as an additional 18 local language communities around the globe. Both NetPro and the SAP Business Community won multiple awards for their excellence in meeting member needs. Since then, Impact Interactions’ team members have helped multiple B2B technology companies ranging from Cisco to SAP to NetApp to IBM to Intel understand how to use social media and online communities to generate leads, lower support costs, educate staff, and extend offline events.

“Too often companies focus on the tools or third party sites like Twitter or Facebook, then wonder why they aren’t getting the results they anticipated,” states Mike Rowland, president of Impact Interactions. “In the technology industry, the users are very sophisticated and have clearly defined needs that must be met to succeed. Our methodology begins with defining success from a measurement point of view. We then build out key performance indicators (KPIs) to track our success based upon three categories of measurement: Traffic, Behavior, and Value. Too often marketers substitute traffic metrics or behavior activities for value. This is why so many senior executives have difficulty believing that social media is effective, even in technology companies. In order to demonstrate true value to the organization, you have to move beyond traffic and behavior and find the economic value of social media activities.”

Recently, Impact Interactions was selected by Cisco to help with its launch of the Cisco Support Community Hall of Fame and Expert program, as well as the NetPro Poland and CSC Japan communities. Our continuing work for Cisco also includes social media reporting, community moderation, and social media consulting projects for the marketing and support channels.

Work for SAP includes partner channel social media enablement activities, Best Performance program training for partners in EMEA, as well as dashboard creation and management for SME online activities.

NetApp activities are focused primarily upon the NetApp Community, a leading information source for storage professionals. We also are working with NetApp to create a measurement methodology which proves the value of the community and corresponding social media efforts to senior executives. Additionally, we created measurement dashboards for NetApp’s management team.

Visitors to the Impact Interactions exhibition space at SocialTech 2010 will be provided with the opportunity to sign up for a free 45 minute consultation after the event to answer their specific social media questions. The event is being held at the DoubleTree San Jose on October 26, 2010. More details can be found by visiting the MarketingProfs’ event site.

“We look forward to meeting with attendees to share the best practices we developed over the past ten years helping our technology clients succeed,” states Mr. Rowland. “If social media is to move past the hype and become a successful long term strategic asset for companies, we have to demonstrate not only what works but how success is measured.”

Back to the blog

Moving Beyond Counts & Traffic – Social Media Measurement That Works

Lots of interesting research coming out on Social Media recently. We take note because the results and conclusions continue to demonstrate that measurement remains a high priority for executives, but what is delivered is not meeting their needs. Let’s take a look at some recent examples of companies surveyed about their social media efforts from a measurement point of view.

First a study from White Horse of 104 companies using social media shows us that when companies try to measure the success of their social media efforts, that very few (less than 15%) are able to get to an ROI for their work. They continue to use traffic and participation (we put that in our behavior metrics) to demonstrate success.

Here is another study which demonstrates a similar point, that companies are using social media traffic and behavior metrics as a measurement of success. This study completed by King Fish Media in June 2010 has great information; unfortunately, it reveals that while many companies say that they have a social media strategy in place they don’t understand how to measure its results.

Perhaps it is the way the research is presented versus the actual question asked, but when you read the measurements used for value they are not representing economic value in most cases. Rather, marketers and others measuring social media continue to focus on representing traffic as some sort of proxy for value. Worse, many still believe that the number of followers on Twitter or fans on Facebook is a valuable metric to use to demonstrate value. They couldn’t be more wrong…

Even the famed Guy Kawasaki is promoting an idea that the more followers the better during a TweetChat on MarketingProfs…but his perspective is the larger the audience from a sheer numbers perspective the better your results will be. In our experience, that is just not true. We see that the more QUALIFIED followers you have, the better your results MIGHT be.Why? Because the value of a follower is zero until they do something that brings value to the organization. If all they are doing is following and never taking action, can you assign a value to them? We think not. Have you analyzed your followers? How many are customers? How many are prospects? How many are competitors? (How many have followed your account to simply build their own counts through an auto-follow?)

So where does all this lead? Well, if you are attending theiStrategy meeting in Chicago on September 15-16, we’ll be there to address this issue. I’ll be presenting this topic on the morning of the 16th to the attendees.

I’ll demonstrate a stronger methodology for using a more integrated approach to your social media efforts which allows you to focus only on the metrics that really matter… those that lead to economic value for your organization.

For those of you who cannot attend, the presentation will be added to our social media resource center after the meeting ends. For those of you who are attending, please bring your questions!

Back to the blog

Social Media: Whose Brand Is It? A Contrarian View

This week’s Fortune Magazine has a very interesting article in its career section titled “Building Your Brand (and keeping your job)” by Jost Hyatt. Are you a senior level marketer in an company that is moving quickly into social media? If so, this article should be on your critical reading list. Here’s why (excerpted from the article):

“When Monty joined Ford, he brought with him 3,500 Twitter followers; he now counts 41,000, conceding that many of those came with the big blue oval logo that now accompanies his tweets.”

“And he’s kept his Twitter handle as @scottmonty rather than adding the Ford brand. ‘I was Scott Monty before I came to Ford, and I’ll be Scott Monty after I leave Ford,’ he says.”

And he is absolutely correct… when he leaves Ford, he takes all the brand equity from his social media efforts with him. Well, maybe not all but certainly a lot.  This is not a criticism of Scott in any way, just a social media tactic that is going to back fire with a lot of companies as the economy gets better and people start changing companies again.

As we wrote in an earlier blog post, Walking Out the Door with the Twitter Password, organizations must have a plan for social media and turnover of employees. But we didn’t go in to the brand equity and ownership issue. So with the above article as an example, here are our thoughts.

Contrary to popular opinion that brands are owned by everyone in the world of social media and that organizations should give up control, we argue that this advice results in companies giving away valuable assets. The number one objective for using social media from a brand perspective should be to build the importance of the brand in the audience’s thoughts. That’s why marketers use advertising to build awareness, coupons to build trial use, and consistency in branding to build a relationship with consumers. In B2B terms, it’s still about awareness but the relationship factor becomes even more important. With all of the money spent by marketers to build their brands, enhance them, and promote them, why would they let the value slip away as someone walks out the door for a new position? But with the social media tactics promoted and utilized by so many, this is exactly what companies are doing.

“People forget that they are always representing their companies… If you send a tweet that says ‘My Boss sucks,’ you have to be aware of what could happen.” – Lucia Erwin, fomrerly H-P’s sr. director of strategic workforce planning

And here’s an example of how personal accounts acting as corporate accounts can back fire from the article:

“Amy D. was a social-networking expert at a marketing firm. She was just ‘letting out some frustration’ last year when she issued a tweet noting the irony that she was editing a presentation about social media for her boss who didn’t use it. She got fired shortly thereafter for violating a new communications policy.”

(Amy probably wasn’t a real social networking expert because that was such a rookie mistake. But that is another story about our industry all together…)

So what is a company to do? Well, for one rethink this tactic. Think about the number of cases where an employee has tweeted, added to their wall, or commented on a blog inappropriately or worse in a way critical of the brand. It’s easy to write these off as isolated instances, but it happens a lot. That’s why companies institute social media policies for their organizaiton’s employees to follow. It gives them recourse and a limited amount of protection should they fire someone (as also mentioned in the article above).

A better tactic is to use the brand as the leader, not an individual. The account(s) are owned by the company, not the individual. The passwords are the property of the company. If the individual leaves, the account remains in tact but with a new author. Does the author get some credit? Sure, in the profile section of the company brand’s account. For example, the account for your product could be titled “AcmeWidgets” with a profile that states “AcmeWidgets provides product information and company communications. Our account is written and managed by JoAnn Smith, an Acme employee with six years of experience in the Widget Industry.” (See our Twitter account profile as an example: @ImpactInteract.)

That way, the focus of your company’s social media efforts remains on the brand not on the personality of the employee. It also gives credit to your employee, but allows your company to switch out the author at any time without losing your audience. 

While some ‘gurus’ and social media ‘experts’ will argue about transparency or being authentic here, this tactic is transparent/authentic, it gives your company a social media voice, and it allows for a measure of protection of your most valuable asset…. your brand.

Sometimes, it pays to follow a contrarian idea and go against the ‘wisdom of the crowd’ especially if it involves maintaining your brand’s position and standing in an ever growing social world.

Back to the blog