Misleading Indicators – Followers & Friends
Saw this on my twitter feed yesterday:

What immediately struck me was the implied assumption that the number of followers you have infers a level of influence. In our opinion that’s a risky assumption to make especially if you are going to make a business decision using this as a key metric.
Here is what I sent back to Jeremiah via DM:

Let me translate my Twitterese….
The number of followers is not a direct measure of influence. Too many ‘experts’ in the social media field believe that it is and continue to sell this notion. I can quickly and easily increase the number of my followers using hashtags and keywords that are popular. Yet that doesn’t necessarily mean that I am a stronger influencer than I was with a lower number of followers.
Those folks with a larger number of followers should not necessarily receive special treatment from brands. The number of followers or friends a person has on Twitter or Facebook really has minimal bearing on their actual influence. (I know that’s a bit heretical, but I’ll get to the why in a little bit.)
- How many people have used the various advertised services to build their followers rather than organically growing their followers by posting relevant content and ideas?
- How many people send an invite/friend request/twitter follow to every email address they have expecting the ‘polite’ return linking/friending/following behavior?
- How many of the top people in terms of followers have a large brand behind them, providing follower building support? (Example, if you only tweet about HP or Oreo Cookies you’ll develop following due to the power of the brand not necessarily because you are a thought leader in the space.)
Because these numbers can be manipulated, they are not to be trusted as a direct metrics proxy for influence.
The example that I use in our social media workshops uses a metric that everyone thought was a useful metric way back when in 2000-2003: Hits. The logic at the time was that the more hits there were in a given period of time, the better the site was in meeting its goals. But alas, this metric could be easily manipulated. Want more hits? Add more banner ads, objects, photos, etc. to the page. Voila! Higher counts so more success, right? Well, not really.
Follower counts are the same as hit counts. Look at some of the top people on Twitter with 5,000+ followers. If they are focused on a single topic, they probably do have influence. But most people are not that focused, tweeting about business, sports teams, their family, current events, pets, politics, etc. Do these folks really have a sphere of influence that marketers can embrace and attempt to cultivate through the Twitter Celebrity? Hard to tell.
The idea of identifying influencers in an easy to understand and quick manner has been a search for the holy grail since online communities started becoming more popular in 2000. At Participate.com, we hired smart people to analyze metrics and activities to develop relevant networked connections that indicated a level of influence within the community. We used the new techniques of social mapping as well as relationship metrics of interactions. The work was never easy and it never gave a true understanding of influence. What did give some insight into influence, was looking to see how others interacted with the individual, not how many individuals read his or her content.
For marketers, a better way to measure influence is to analyze the content being added on Twitter in conjunction with analyzing who the person’s followers are. This is a tough, manual project. But in the end, you’ll have a much better understanding of whether or not a particular individual with a high following is actually an influencer.
As much as we want one, sometimes there is no holy grail. Using simple metrics as proxies is not a substitute for the hard work that data analysis takes to prove a hypothesis. Don’t fall for the trap of taking the easy way out.
Have a different opinion? Please share your thoughts with us in the comments’ section.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Monday, December 14th, 2009 at 4:10 pm and is filed under Best Practices, Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Social Media Monitoring Software – Welcome to the Emerald City

After four weeks of evaluating social media software vendors, we’ve come to some conclusions about the reality of these tools versus the hype that we heard along the way. Let’s just say that the parallels to the Wizard of Oz are pretty interesting…
Ever since I played the Wizard in third grade at Grant School, I’ve really loved this movie, the books, and all things Oz in general. In fact, the head janitor at my town’s high school (Westfield HS in NJ) was one of the flying monkeys in the movie! But I digress…
Impact Interactions provides multiple types of social media services to our clients including consulting, moderation, and reporting. We’ve also been doing social media monitoring for several years for a couple of clients (although it was first called Brand Defense, then Reputation Management, and now Social Media Monitoring). It was a natural extension for our trained moderation teams to help clients. We’ve been looking for a good tool for our monitoring projects rather than relying on manual means of collection. We’ve spent several weeks talking with prospective clients for this service (and yes, it’s a service but more on that later). We’ve also been socializing ideas at conferences with other social media and online community folks to build our business case for adding this service. So with all of that background, here is how the Wizard of Oz fits in…
I Am The Great And Powerful Oz!

In listening to people speak about social media monitoring tools, they believe that they are an all powerful tool for learning where all active conversations about their brand are being held online. The content is fresh, vibrant, and oh so relevant to their business objectives. Many believe that they’ll be able to manage the flow of information with this great tool, driving insights into their organizations effectively through the export of reports from these all powerful tools. Blogs- check. Twitter- check. Article comments- check. Communities- check. Sentiment analysis- check.
Unfortunately some of the hype around these tools has put vendors in the position of trying to meet these expectations with tools that look great, work smoothly, and export reports in a single click.
Ignore That Man Behind The Curtain!

Just as the Wizard was discovered to be a mere mortal, many customers are discovering that they had expectations that were far too high for the tools. What they are finding is that the tools take someone to work with them daily to review the delivered content, decide which nuggets of information are relevant, build the trends in content sentiment, and create the report. Just as Dorothy and friends put all their faith in the wizard only to be disappointed when Toto pulled the curtain back, many companies are finding out that Social Media Monitoring requires more than a tool… it requires a team to review the content and deliver what is relevant.
I’m Not A Bad Person, Really.

The software vendors on the other hand must shake their heads when they hear the expectations for their tools. In our discussions with many of the top vendors (and some start ups too), we found them refreshingly honest about the capabilities of their tools. This was especially the case when the hot topics of Sentiment Analysis, Twitter, and Online Community searches came up.
Sentiment analysis is an art form, not an absolute according to every single vendor we spoke with. The range of accuracy claimed by the vendors we spoke to ranged from a low of 30% to a high of 55%. In our B2B and B2C report testing, that range seems about right. Since most if not all vendors use a similar algorithm to categorize content, that would make sense.
In essence these tools work by analysing the 2-3 words prior and after the associated keyword to determine sentiment. As we can demonstrate, there are many false positives and negatives. To counter that, most allow the end user to rate or assign sentiment to content they find with the idea of strengthening the algorithm for future searches.
Twitter is another interesting discussion. Since Twitter is the social media du jour, everyone is interested in their Twitter buzz. The issue is that these tools use the Twitter search functionality rather than getting a full read into the Twitter Database of Tweets. (Say that five times fast!) So even the top tools are not much better than doing a Twitter search on your own. But as we were told, everyone of the vendors is working on this. According to Microsoft, Bing will have this capability soon. (Kara Swisher broke the news on this one.)
When the subject of online community content was discussed we received the same honest answers from everyone. If the community has an RSS feed, they can get the information. If it doesn’t you are out of luck. We also learned that several vendors are working on a new tact to obtain the deepest of relationship content. One of those vendors is Boardreader. They are a company to watch if your interest is in content from communities.
The Good News – The Wizard Can Help!

Just as the Wizard offered to help Dorothy return to Kansas, many of the vendors in this space will offer to help clients to structure the searches for their project. But in the end, Toto runs off and Dorothy is still stuck in Oz. All the best intentions cannot overcome the single point that organizations need someone to run and make sense of the volumes of data these tools provide.
How Do We Get Back to Kansas Now?

Sometimes despite visiting a Wizard and killing a Witch or two along the way, you still need help to get where you want to go. That’s where we come in. At Impact Interactions, we recognize that Social Media Monitoring is a service. The choice of tools is important without a doubt, but it takes a person to effectively use the tool and report the results. We offer Social Media Monitoring as a service for clients.
Impact Interactions - A One Stop Shop for Social Media Monitoring

Impact Interactions has a great social media team using a top notch tool to provide social media insight reports for our clients. We understand that you are interested in seeing where the conversations are happening, but don’t have the time to review 1,000 blog posts, 400 tweets, and 500 comments each day. By hiring Impact Interactions, you can concentrate on your strategy while our team provides your Ruby Slippers. And you don’t even have to drop a house on us to get them.
But we don’t stop there! Our team’s experience in online communities is deep. Our social media associates can help you respond to bloggers, commenters, and Twitterers too. We believe that a social media monitoring project should be integrated into your communication efforts. Our team can help you execute that strategy at a reasonable cost.
Want to learn more? Please contact us or give us a call at (410) 604-3304 to discuss how your organization and team can get the most out of social media monitoring services.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 21st, 2009 at 4:40 pm and is filed under Community Moderation, Social Media Industry, Social Media Trends. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Social Media Metrics – Driving to Value
We’re members of the Online Community Research Network and recently received the latest report on Community Metrics derived from a survey of the membership. While we’re happy to see a lot of progress in the responses about tying measurement to business objectives, we continue to see confusion about measuring value. Over the past ten years, we’ve developed a methodology that can help online community and social media managers structure their reporting in order to focus on the value their efforts produce in terms of business objectives.
Looking at the report’s question #12 (Were your community’s metrics created in support of your organization’s broader business goals or were they created independent of a corporate business?), the following responses were given:
- 47% Created to support existing business goals
- 31% Created independently but helping refine existing business goals
- 22% Neither of the above (summarized from three additional responses)
Looking at what metrics the respondents use to support or refine existing business goals provides insight into the confusion over what constitutes value in online community and social media efforts.
Question 19 asked “What are the three most important community key performance indicators (KPIs) in the reports you send to upper level management?” The answers are a startling contrast to the answers to Question 12:
- Number of Page Views or Clicks
- Number of Site Visits
- Number of Unique Visits
Why are these responses startling? Because the metrics are traffic metrics not value metrics. These are base level metrics not KPI worthy metrics for upper level managers. (In fact, three of the top five metrics measured as detailed in an earlier question were traffic metrics too: Unique Visitors, Page Views, and Visitors. Only two were not: Registrations and Posts.)
What these two questions’ responses demonstrate is that the respondents are still struggling with determining value from their community work that truly builds into measurable business objectives.
When asked about ROI, 71% of respondents confused engagement and traffic metrics with value. Only 29% correctly identified a tangible value metric to use in measuring ROI.
To provide a little clarity in reporting metrics, let’s look at how Impact Interactions’ reporting methodology can help. First, our categories are structured as follows:
- Traffic - The basic building blocks that measure “How Many?”
- Behavior – The second level of metrics measuring conversion and engagement
- Value – The highest level of community metric where the activity has an economic or dollar value associated with it (This is what management really cares about!)
Some of the actual metrics that we use for clients are as follows:
- Traffic - Unique Visits, Unique Visitors, Page Views, etc.
- Behavior- Page Views/Unique Visit, Page Views/Unique Visitor, Active Members/Unique Visitors, New Registrations/New Unique Visitors, Total Registrations/Total Unique Visitors, Downloads/Registered Member, Content Added/Registered Member, Content Added/Unique Visitor, Downloads/Unique Visits, Full profiles completed, Referrals from Twitter/Facebook/YouTube, etc.
- Value – Number of successful customer support resolutions in the community, Total Contact Sales Inquiries/ Total Unique Visitors (or Registered Members), Total Leads Qualified/Generated, Product Referrals, Positive Product Reviews as a % of Total Product Reviews, Direct Revenue Generated from Community Activities, Length of Sales Cycle for community member vs non-member, Average Purchase Size/Frequency for community member vs non-member, etc.
Take a look at those metrics again. The first two categories of Traffic and Behavior can usually be obtained using the platform’s tools (like Jive, Telligent, or Lithium) or through your web analytics’ tools (like Google Analytics, Omniture, or WebTrends). The Value metrics take a little more work. In fact, to really be able to perform a realistic ROI calculation, you will need to get help from outside the community/social media area of your organization.
To derive an ROI related to marketing objectives from a community, you’ll need to access your CRM system. For a support ROI, you’ll need to know the cost per interaction in complementary/competitive areas such as a call center. The standard tools won’t get you there, you’ll have to build relationships within your organization in order to really build a solid analysis that ties back to business objectives. An ROI model built on traffic will contain far too many holes to be useful.
We’ve been helping our clients with these issues and have developed a strong set of best practices that can help you succeed in your reporting. Please feel free to share your insights into this issue and ask questions about reporting and analyzing your community and social media efforts. We’re happy to answer them and help reduce the confusion.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Wednesday, September 23rd, 2009 at 11:45 am and is filed under Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
2009 Trends — It’s Not All Doom & Gloom
It has been a very busy summer here at Impact Interactions. We’ve added more work with our existing clients like Cisco and SAP, added new clients, added more staff, launched a new small business service (Impact Social Media), and have received many more calls about our services. Taking a step back from the activity to analyze the social media/online community industry, we’re seeing the following trends emerge:
- While enterprise level organizations are being very careful about spending money, there is a lot of interest in the social media area. We are seeing budgets freeing up, new projects starting and excitement about using social media to market products and services.
- Enterprise online communities continue to launch at an amazing rate. We haven’t seen this type of growth in corporate sponsored B2B communities since 2000 when the concept was very new. The difference is that now there are third party sites like Twitter and YouTube to integrate into the communities.
- Every one wants to avoid making mistakes, placing real best practices at a premium for enterprise companies. While there is always some learning by mistakes made in any venture, the companies we are dealing with always tell us that they want to avoid making the basic mistakes that others have made.
- Analytics are at a premium, but not understood very well by some marketers running communities. We continue to see interest in base level metrics around traffic and basic engagement, but less understanding of value. Part of this is due to the over-reliance on Google Analytics as the main tool instead of a more powerful solution like Omniture. Google Analytics is a basic tool not a true enterprise level analytics tool in our opinion and experience.
- In conjunction with number 4, we also see clients and prospects changing platforms in part due to poor reporting and administrative control pages. Many vendors seem to put reporting and analytics into their platform as an afterthought. Platform providers moving sharply ahead of the field in providing reporting and analytics for their software are Telligent, Lithium, and Jive to a certain degree.
- Outsourced providers of social media expertise and management in areas such as moderation, social media monitoring, reporting, and integration are gaining more interest among enterprise level companies. With headcounts frozen or worse, organizations are looking outside their company for experienced help at an reasonable cost.
- Lastly, the social media consulting industry remains very fractured. There are simply too many small businesses, individual consultants, and former software personnel chasing deals resulting in lower pricing and no concentration of expertise in a meaningful way. In other words, this industry is ripe for a consolidation play. This is what Jeff Dachis of the Dachis Corporation in Austin is slowly building towards. We think that there are multiple opportunities for consolidation and are actively looking for non-software companies to acquire or align with to gain a larger share of this growing market. (It’s only a matter of time before the big guys like Accenture, IBM, or big advertising agencies buy up the industry’s expertise to consolidate their market share.)
So far, 2009 has been far from the doom and gloom year that most were predicting in our industry. Certainly there has been some shakeout, but overall 2009 is shaping up as a really good year overall for social media and online community service companies.
Do you agree with these trends we’re seeing? What else are you seeing in our industry? Please share your comments below.
Mike Rowland, President
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Wednesday, August 26th, 2009 at 11:59 am and is filed under Social Media Industry. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Social Media Monitoring – Man vs. Machine
I’ve been reading several tweets and blog posts about how social media tools such as Radian6 and Scout Labs are gaining traction in the enterprise. That’s not a surprise given the interest in protecting your brand online and uncovering loyal enthusiasts.
In our early Web 1.0 days, we used to do this manually for SAP. Back in 2003, we monitored competitor communities for SAP related content. In 2004 when blogs started to catch on, we found information on several blogs where we could help SAP extend its online reputation.
Now in the wide open Web 2.0+ days, many folks believe that there are too many sources for an individual to keep up with from a monitoring perspective. Many attendees of the recent Online Community Unconference held in June asked our team for our thoughts on sentiment analysis, brand monitoring software, and on brand defense issues.
Our thoughts? Simple, the tools are still evolving and are not quite there yet. For example, the leading criticism of these tools that we have is that they cannot account for context in their analysis of sentiment. Sarcasm is missed. (Of course, no one is really sarcastic in their social media posting are they?)
That’s why you need someone who understands your business to help manage the sentiment analysis and the content it identifies. Social media monitoring is still a bit of an art form. The tools are and will continue to get better, but human interactions require human analysis too. This is something that all brand managers should be doing on a regular basis, even daily for larger brands.
Want to get started with social media monitoring? It’s easy and it’s free. Use Google Alerts, Technorati, Keotag, and BoardTrackerto start. These are all free applications that do a very good job in getting you the content you need to analyze. But analyze it you must (in Yoda-speak) because it still takes a human to understand the content.
If you’d like to learn more, leave us a comment or contact us. We’re happy to help.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Friday, July 24th, 2009 at 5:02 pm and is filed under Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Online Community – Moving Beyond Metrics to ROI
We gave a presentation on building ROI models for online communities at the Online Community Unconference in Mountain View, CA on June 10th. It was added because so many of the participants stated that ROI and calculating the value of their community was the most important issue they faced. So, we didn’t have time to build a true presentation, but rather lead a workshop for participants to learn more. It was lead by our president, Mike Rowland.
Here are the summary notes taken during the session:
- Have to first identify what is the economic value of the community to the organization offering it: (Don’t confuse traffic or behavior metrics with value)
- Cost Avoidance
- Increased subscription rates or lower churn rate
- More frequent purchase rates
- Higher purchase level/amts
- Faster close for large item sales
- Reduce lead generation cost
- Once you’ve identified your value metrics, break down your metrics into 3 buckets to look at communities:
- Traffic – PV, visits, visitors, etc.
- Behavior – What they do when the get there, who they are, download/visit, contribution/member, responses by employees vs. customers
- Value – can attach an economic value to it. Need $ to get to a true ROI model. See above list.
- You have to build relationships w/ the folks in your company. Need access to other systems. You cannot build ROI from community analytics provided by software vendors or from traffic and behavior metrics alone.
- ROI Frameworks:
- Cost Avoidance
- The person who proposes the question needs to verify the answer. This is a feature needed in the platform.
- # of community support resolutions X $ complimentary support resolution (1-800 number) = total cost avoidance -> economic value
- Track over set period of time (e.g. quarterly or yearly)
- ROI = (total economic value – total costs to set up and run forum) / total costs –> over one period and as a percentage
- Increased subscription or reduced churn
- Customer database compared to community database
- cust. database = Average churn rate (e.g. the number of months the avg user subscribes) X price/subscription = customer value
- Community database – look at active members and see if the churn rate is better or worse.
- Price will be the same, so you’ll have to see if the churn rate was more or less. If subscriptions are longer, than you have a higher customer value for community members.
- Shows you slowed the churn rate down.
- More frequent purchase or Higher Purchase level/amts
- Use your eCommerce DB or CRM system
- What is the avg amt customers spend/purchase?
- go back to comm DB and parce out active members and compare to ecommerce DB (which ones spend more/purchase?)
- Do comm members have a higher spend/purchase? active comm users X avg $ they spend = economic value
- Need to trend this and see how it fluctuates.
- what is the average number of items in completed shopping activity? (e.g. 1.6 items) Do comm members buy more?
- Avg cost/item X avg # items = economic value
- CRM decrease cost
- Want to find what avg value of customer is
- Faster close of sale (Good for large purchases like software or hardware systems)
- How fast are organizations moving through your CRM system to sale?
- Identify active organizations in community DB to compare them to avg organizations.
- How long does it take the avg. organization to go through sale stages? What’s the cost/sale? Do active organizations in your community go through more quickly and spend more?
- Lead generation cost
- Similar to above, but use cost to generate a lead for average customer versus those which originate in community/social media campaigns
- Cost Avoidance
- How can you tell if a user came to your comm and then bought your product through a 3rd party reseller? You can’t unless your resellers provide access to their databases which is next to impossible to get.
- Users of support communities become brand neutral after their issue becomes resolved.
- Hidden costs of community for ROI Analysis, make sure you count these:
- Servers
- development costs
- customizations
- widgets
- maintenance
- Make sure that you are amortizing your costs across the same time period as your economic value or you will skew your results.
One point to remember is that the value of communities really is derived from active members, not all members. So define your active members with criteria that meet your behavioral key performance indicators (KPIs). For example, an active member can be someone who posted in a forum, downloaded a featured whitepaper, uploaded content, or viewed a webcast in the past month. For B2B especially, it doesn’t have to be an activity within the past week as most B2B community members average 2-3 visits per month unless they are deep into the sales cycle.
The number one issue to watch out for when building your ROI framework is the use of proxies. If you cannot get the data, don’t guess at a proxy for the value because the more proxies you utilize the bigger the house of cards that you build.
Lastly, value can be a set of different items. For a subscription based community value can be both churn rate differential and purchase levels. ROI is not a single value formula, it is a multiple value formula in most cases as there is marketing value in support communities and vice versa. So make sure that you are at least attempting to capture as much of the value drivers as possible in your analysis.
Want to learn more about online community or social media ROI? Contact us today or leave a comment.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Monday, June 22nd, 2009 at 11:47 am and is filed under Best Practices, Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
B2B Communities – What Works
We gave a presentation at last week’s Online Community Unconference (site is open to the public as of June 19th per Forum One) in Mountain View, CA on B2B Communities. We weren’t surprised by the number of attendees looking to learn more about the best practices for running a B2B Community, but were surprised a little bit by some of the misperceptions on managing them.
Top Best Practices for B2B Communities:
- B2B Community Members have higher expectations than B2C members. You must engage with them as they want to engage with your company just as much as they want to engage with their peers.
- B2B Communities require internal SMEs to engage early and remain committed to meeting member needs until external SMEs can compliment the internal SME efforts.
- Third party applications like Twitter and Facebook should not be used as external competitive communities, but rather should be utilized as beacons to drive traffic to your community and key information.
- You can measure the ROI for B2B communities, but you cannot get there by using only community software metrics and/or web analytics packages like Omniture or Google Analytics. None of these provide true value metrics that have an economic value associated with them. To get to ROI, you must build relationships within your organization so you can obtain real data on customers, leads, ecommerce transactions, etc.
- When budgeting for B2B communities, be realistic. For example, no single vendor of software or web design or implementation services will ever come in exactly where they quote when you want additional features or customization. So build a small cushion into your budget to be safe.
- To attract business decision makers, you must focus on how they will use the site… not how you want to market to them.
- The higher the level within an organization your potential members have attained, the lower the amount of time they will have to spend on your site. So don’t waste their time!
In short, B2B communities can deliver impressive results when managed properly with a focus on those segments who deliver the value to your organization. Don’t be all things to all people, that strategy is doomed to fail. To learn more about the best practices for B2B communities, please download our presentation , ask questions in the comments area below, or contact us.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 17th, 2009 at 12:49 pm and is filed under Best Practices, Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Online Community – Understanding the Myths
Are You Blindly Following the “Wisdom of the Crowds” ?
Last year, we presented this topic at the Online Community Unconference in NYC to a standing room only crowd. It’s a fun topic, albeit one that elicits strong opinions and discussions. Whether you are an industry veteran or someone who is new to online communities and social media, this presentation can help you understand and avoid some of the classic mistakes being sold by the blogosphere and ‘gurus’ every day online. It’s available in our Social Media Resources area as a pdf that you can download.
For this month’s Online Community Unconference (June 10th in Mountain View, CA0, we are updating the presentation to cover even more myths that continue to gain a following despite impacting the results of communities and their teams. For example, are you using B2C thinking in your B2B community? Are you sure you need to be on third party platforms like Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, and others? What about metrics, are you confusing traffic with value? What role should volunteers play in your community?
These and other topics will be discussed in our talk. We hope that you’ll join us.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Monday, June 1st, 2009 at 6:32 pm and is filed under Best Practices. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
The New Reality – What It Takes To Get Hired In Social Media
The economy is tough, but social media keeps growing. Impact Interactions is growing this year and once again is adding staff. We’re also trying to help those impacted by the economy and those coming right out of school to understand what working in social media is really like.
From our experience, here is what it takes to get hired:
- A focus on business skills like written communications, presentations, and statistics
- Understanding of how businesses operate from a financial perspective
- A basic understanding of Marketing, eCommerce, Advertising, and Sales
- Experience as a team member who’s used the power of collaboration to help everyone succeed
- A positive attitude
- A “relaxed” professional appearance (you know what business casual means)
Did you expect that?
Notice what’s missing?
That’s right, you do not have to be a Facebook addict or have 2,000 followers on Twitter or 500 connections on LinkedIn. You don’t have to know how to build a widget to update a user for when the top 20 members are on the site. If you use Tweetdeck, great. If you have no idea what it is, no problem.
Yet, when we give career talks, advice to job seekers, and interview our own candidates they focus on their Facebook or MySpace skill, the number of followers they have on Twitter, or what online community they use. What are we focused on? Simple, can the candidate learn our business while building strong relationships with our clients? Can the candidate make the client look good while understanding that he or she will be in the background?
Afterall, Social Media for all its wonderful claims of revolutionizing the world is really just another set of tools to increase the efficiency of business in meeting their goals. Direct mail, robo-calls, telemarketing, advertorials, infomercials, email campaigns, listservs, click-to-chat, click-to-call, and other marketing tactics helped businesses gain efficiency in their marketing efforts. Social Media is doing the same thing. The underlying principle is to use the correct tool set to engage your customers in a way that benefits both sides of the relationship. (It really is that simple.)
But you have to understand and like business for business sake. Because Social Media is not all about playing with the latest cool technology, it’s about getting results. No results equals no budget.
The great push right now is to find employees who can help companies understand social media and measure the results of their efforts. Think about every online community, web 2.0, or social media conference you’ve attended or read about… what is the one area that is always a topic of interest? Measurement and monetization.
Success in Social Media requires a focus on results, thinking strategically and executing tactics that achieve tangible results like additional sales, reduced marketing costs, faster velocity of sales, reduced lead generation costs, reduced support costs, etc. There are so many people who want to work in Social Media today, but few are willing to demonstrate their business acumen to get the position. We saw this in the late 1990s in the online community world, again in around 2003 with the blogosphere, and yet again in 2005 with the early social network companies. And here we are almost ten years later with the same issues.
So do you want to work in Social Media? My advice to you is brush up on your business skills first. Worry about your number of followers on Twitter later.
What do you think? What skills do you think it takes to work in Social Media?
Mike
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Thursday, May 28th, 2009 at 5:32 pm and is filed under Best Practices, Measurement & Reporting. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Twitter for Small Business = Great Tactic
Over the past several days, we’ve seen more news on Twitter for small business come out in the press and blogosphere. For example, there’s the AdAge article “Twitter Proves Its Worth as a Killer App for Local Businesses” which has several success stories of how small businesses have won customers using Twitter. Even Twitter themselves are contemplating how to help small businesses use their platform to grow. While they are focused on analytics rather than advertising ( a good sign), Twitter is doing a great job of trying to understand and reach an important segment which will help them grow.
We see the use of Twitter with our large clients like Cisco and NetApp continuing to grow. But we are also getting more inquiries from smaller companies who don’t want to host a community, but want to use social media effectively to achieve their goals. In our discussions, we suggest using applications like Twitter, Yelp, Facebook, LinkedIn, Bebo, MySpace and others to start building their online brand and reputation. The response we get in many cases is:
“Okay, that makes sense but I don’t have anyone to run this.”
We’ve seen a small market emerge in technology to monitor social media and brand reputation (keotag & boardtracker come to mind). But there also needs to be a new service to help small businesses use social media effectively at a price that works…and that seems to be the missing piece of the puzzle to gaining wider adoption of these tools.
It’s an issue that we’ll be working on in the next few weeks. Stay tuned.
Back to the blog
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 19th, 2009 at 1:04 pm and is filed under Best Practices, Social Media Trends, Uncategorized. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
About Us
Categories
Tag Cloug
Web Metrics social media online trust video uploads Success Metrics Web 2.0 Web Strategy Metrics online community best practices Return on Investment online marketing Web Analytics online community reporting online community ROI online moderation Best Practices online community management b2b communities customer communities online community social networks interactive strategy myspace social media tools internet jobs facebook Twitter online community benchmarks Management & Moderation online community strategyRecent Comments
- Matthew Lees commented on Walking out the Door with the Twitter Password: A Few Words on Social Media Maturity "Crystal – You’re right that Twitter isn’t very sophisticated about account ownership. It comes down to access to the..."
- crystal haidl commented on Walking out the Door with the Twitter Password: A Few Words on Social Media Maturity "So, how does a company resolve the problem? Does Twitter have a policy on how a company or organization can either repossess or..."
- Betty commented on Social Business Summit 2010- Looking at the Big Picture "Congratulations on a successful presentation at Internet World! The use of online communities as another tool for companies to reach out to their customers and their..."