<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It’s Not About You: Where Organizations Miss the Boat on Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://impactinteractions.com/best-practices/it%e2%80%99s-not-about-you-where-organizations-miss-the-boat-on-social-media/660%20%20/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://impactinteractions.com/best-practices/it%e2%80%99s-not-about-you-where-organizations-miss-the-boat-on-social-media/660</link>
	<description>Online Community and Social Media Best Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 21:14:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rowland</title>
		<link>http://impactinteractions.com/best-practices/it%e2%80%99s-not-about-you-where-organizations-miss-the-boat-on-social-media/660#comment-1512</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactinteractions.com/?p=660#comment-1512</guid>
		<description>Brute strength is always the best convincer....

Actually, there are so many examples of companies doing it right that once you show the research and examples the discussion changes to &quot;how can we do the same?&quot; We have quite a library of information that we use to help our clients going all the way back to 2000. Our examples are from name companies and large brands (both clients and others) that have done things well and those that have failed completely.

For our client examples, we also have the benefit of knowing the metrics which back up the tactic and content strategy approach we promote... nothing that would violate an NDA but rather trends that we&#039;ve measured over time that include content strategy shifts marked against the resulting metrics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brute strength is always the best convincer&#8230;.</p>
<p>Actually, there are so many examples of companies doing it right that once you show the research and examples the discussion changes to &#8220;how can we do the same?&#8221; We have quite a library of information that we use to help our clients going all the way back to 2000. Our examples are from name companies and large brands (both clients and others) that have done things well and those that have failed completely.</p>
<p>For our client examples, we also have the benefit of knowing the metrics which back up the tactic and content strategy approach we promote&#8230; nothing that would violate an NDA but rather trends that we&#8217;ve measured over time that include content strategy shifts marked against the resulting metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MatthewLees</title>
		<link>http://impactinteractions.com/best-practices/it%e2%80%99s-not-about-you-where-organizations-miss-the-boat-on-social-media/660#comment-1502</link>
		<dc:creator>MatthewLees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 20:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactinteractions.com/?p=660#comment-1502</guid>
		<description>Those are interesting percentage breakdowns, Mike, and ones I&#039;d think would be valuable benchmarks to followers of your blog. I expect that a large part of the reason why you&#039;re seeing such a high percentage of Product Information (B2B) and Promotion and Discounts (B2C) is because that info is so easy for companies to get. Heck, that&#039;s what marketing professionals are paid to create. So they have it at their disposal and, understandably, want to get it out there through any and all available channels.

Pulling together Thought Leadership content and Industry Analysis takes more planning and work. Perhaps additional resources, too, which can&#039;t be easy to get these days, whether it&#039;s taking some time from an existing employee&#039;s schedule, or getting new headcount.

For the companies you&#039;ve worked with that needed to be convinced of the wisdom of your advice   ;-)  , I&#039;m curious as to how you&#039;ve steered them toward a more customer-centric (and no doubt more effective) mix. Gentle persuasion? Metrics that proved your point? Fist fights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are interesting percentage breakdowns, Mike, and ones I&#8217;d think would be valuable benchmarks to followers of your blog. I expect that a large part of the reason why you&#8217;re seeing such a high percentage of Product Information (B2B) and Promotion and Discounts (B2C) is because that info is so easy for companies to get. Heck, that&#8217;s what marketing professionals are paid to create. So they have it at their disposal and, understandably, want to get it out there through any and all available channels.</p>
<p>Pulling together Thought Leadership content and Industry Analysis takes more planning and work. Perhaps additional resources, too, which can&#8217;t be easy to get these days, whether it&#8217;s taking some time from an existing employee&#8217;s schedule, or getting new headcount.</p>
<p>For the companies you&#8217;ve worked with that needed to be convinced of the wisdom of your advice   <img src='http://impactinteractions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />   , I&#8217;m curious as to how you&#8217;ve steered them toward a more customer-centric (and no doubt more effective) mix. Gentle persuasion? Metrics that proved your point? Fist fights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Rowland</title>
		<link>http://impactinteractions.com/best-practices/it%e2%80%99s-not-about-you-where-organizations-miss-the-boat-on-social-media/660#comment-1499</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rowland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactinteractions.com/?p=660#comment-1499</guid>
		<description>Nice post Matthew. When we are approached by prospective clients, we can usually tell who will succeed quickly and who will need a change of focus in order to succeed with social media. Too often company teams are only interested in the end game of sales, leads, subscriptions, etc. without thinking about how to nurture their customers through an appropriate engagement cycle.

In social media, the engagement cycle means changing behaviors to include your efforts in the audience&#039;s day-to-day, week-to-week, or month-to-month habits. To not consider behavior in your social media mix is to use social media in the same way that a spammer uses email. The focus cannot always be on &quot;You&quot; but rather it needs to be on &quot;Them&quot; instead.

We have developed best practices that show that for B2B companies, social media efforts should break down as follows: 50% Thought Leadership, 20% Industry Analysis, 15% Event Coverage/Promotion, 15% Product Information (YOU). 

Yet we often see a more B2C breakdown instead. Our research shows that B2C brands use a social media mix that breaksdown as: 50% Promotion and Sales (Discounts), 25% Thought Leadership, 20% Industry Analysis, and 5% Press Release coverage.

When &quot;You&quot; concentrate on &quot;You&quot; and not &quot;Them&quot; you miss the idea of social media. &quot;You&quot; are important to your audience. If &quot;You&quot; weren&#039;t there wouldn&#039;t be visitors, but a clear focus on the message and content strategies is a big part of making social media effective. Remember that social media is a tactic for not only building business results, but also for nurturing your potential audience as well.

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Matthew. When we are approached by prospective clients, we can usually tell who will succeed quickly and who will need a change of focus in order to succeed with social media. Too often company teams are only interested in the end game of sales, leads, subscriptions, etc. without thinking about how to nurture their customers through an appropriate engagement cycle.</p>
<p>In social media, the engagement cycle means changing behaviors to include your efforts in the audience&#8217;s day-to-day, week-to-week, or month-to-month habits. To not consider behavior in your social media mix is to use social media in the same way that a spammer uses email. The focus cannot always be on &#8220;You&#8221; but rather it needs to be on &#8220;Them&#8221; instead.</p>
<p>We have developed best practices that show that for B2B companies, social media efforts should break down as follows: 50% Thought Leadership, 20% Industry Analysis, 15% Event Coverage/Promotion, 15% Product Information (YOU). </p>
<p>Yet we often see a more B2C breakdown instead. Our research shows that B2C brands use a social media mix that breaksdown as: 50% Promotion and Sales (Discounts), 25% Thought Leadership, 20% Industry Analysis, and 5% Press Release coverage.</p>
<p>When &#8220;You&#8221; concentrate on &#8220;You&#8221; and not &#8220;Them&#8221; you miss the idea of social media. &#8220;You&#8221; are important to your audience. If &#8220;You&#8221; weren&#8217;t there wouldn&#8217;t be visitors, but a clear focus on the message and content strategies is a big part of making social media effective. Remember that social media is a tactic for not only building business results, but also for nurturing your potential audience as well.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevinSRyan</title>
		<link>http://impactinteractions.com/best-practices/it%e2%80%99s-not-about-you-where-organizations-miss-the-boat-on-social-media/660#comment-1495</link>
		<dc:creator>KevinSRyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://impactinteractions.com/?p=660#comment-1495</guid>
		<description>Interesting insights, Matthew. I believe that, for the most part, the &quot;them&quot; in these communities want us to succeed. They have a lot invested in our brands and our products -- literally and figuratively. And they&#039;re there for us. The least we could do is let them know they&#039;re appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting insights, Matthew. I believe that, for the most part, the &#8220;them&#8221; in these communities want us to succeed. They have a lot invested in our brands and our products &#8212; literally and figuratively. And they&#8217;re there for us. The least we could do is let them know they&#8217;re appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

